Eu nu inteleg de ce guvernul nu se bazeaza pe alta liniste. Linistea cresterii economice, prin creearea de locuri de munca, prin deschiderea de noi capacitati productive. Noi ne bazam astazi doar pe consum si de loc pe productie. Ce politica economica e asta. Imprumuturi si consum. Faliment scrie pe noi !
"Linistea asta" le aduce bani vanzatorilor-de-tara si necazuri
tie. Daca ar fi cum zici, ti-ar aduce tie bucurii si lor munca pentru meritarea salariilor.
Ai 3 incercari sa ghicesti ce cale au ales mariile-lor:
"Enter Destabilization 1.1. This version of the destabilization program is less messy, offering plausible deniability for the western powers who are overthrowing a foreign government. It starts when the IMF moves in to offer a bribe to a tinpot dictator in a third world country. He gets 10% in exchange for taking out an exorbitant loan for an infrastructure project that the country can't afford. When the country inevitably defaults on the loan payments, the IMF begins to take over, imposing a restructuring program that eventually results in the full scale looting of the country's resources for western business interests. This program, too, was run in country after country, from Jamaica to Myanmar, from Chile to Zimbabwe. The source code for this program was revealed in 2001, however, when former World Bank chief economist Joseph Stiglitz went public about the scam. More detail was added in 2004 by the publication of John Perkin's Confessions of an Economic Hitman, which revealed the extent to which front companies and complicit corporations aided, abetted and facilitated the economic plundering and overthrow of foreign governments. Although still an effective technique for overthrowing foreign nations, the fact that this particular scam had been exposed meant that the architects of global geopolitics would have to find a new way to get rid of foreign, democratically elected governments.
Destabilization 1.2 involves seemingly disinterested, democracy promoting NGOs with feelgood names like the Open Society Institute, Freedom House and the National Endowment for Democracy. They fund, train, support and mobilize opposition movements in countries that have been targeted for destabilization, often during elections and usually organized around an identifiable color. These "color revolutions" sprang up in the past decade and have so far successfully destabilized the governments of the Ukraine, Lebanon, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan, among others. These revolutions bear the imprint of billionaire finance oligarch George Soros. The hidden hand of western powers behind these color revolutions has threatened their effectiveness in recent years, however, with an anti-Soros movement having arisen in Georgia and with the recent Moldovan "grape revolution" having come to naught (much to the chagrin of Soros-funded OSI's Evgeny Morozov)."
Cauta si tu pe site=ul asta
si pe Hotnews (ca pe acolo ma uit eu si stiu ca merge) sa vezi unde se situeaza in UE ritmurile de crestere ale productie si exportului in Romania si o sa intelegi ce vrei sa spui.
problema este ca anterior, cand erau bani garla, consumul a fost stimulat artificial in loc sa se faca exact ce vrei tu acum. Adica pe sistem grecesc: ii bagam pe toti la stat , le dam lefuri si bonusuri si apoi.....
Ce se poate reprosa in acest moment acestui Guvern este ca rata de absorbtie a fondurilor Ue este asa de mica...
Roaga-te sa se trezeasca cu Orban in frunte, care stii bine ca provine din PNL, deci inca o dovada ca incepe sa se prefere competenta fata de politic.. si sa le tinem pumnii. Daca iese, nu castiga Opozitia, dar castiga Romaania..