cui ii pasa ? nu vedeti cati zbiara "sa li se dea" ?
sa li se dea .
si dupa ei , potopul .
urati indivizi au fost recrutati in "sistem" , ca astia zbiara cel mai tare , astia sunt atinsi la miile de euroi /luna .
Europa de est,Romania este in pericol din vina kilerului Jef.Franks
cel care este acuzat international ca a ucis si Argentina.Acest ucigas economic nu are nici o jena sa fie complice cu un terorist international si asasin al securitatii comuniste romanesti,basescu traian,dar si cu gruparea de crima organizata PDL-Udrea-Boc in asasinarea economica a Romaniei.
Asasinul economic Jeffrey Franks a ucis si economia Argentinei.
Enter Destabilization 1.1. This version of the destabilization program is less messy, offering plausible deniability for the western powers who are overthrowing a foreign government. It starts when the IMF moves in to offer a bribe to a tinpot dictator in a third world country. He gets 10% in exchange for taking out an exorbitant loan for an infrastructure project that the country can't afford. When the country inevitably defaults on the loan payments, the IMF begins to take over, imposing a restructuring program that eventually results in the full scale looting of the country's resources for western business interests. This program, too, was run in country after country, from Jamaica to Myanmar, from Chile to Zimbabwe. The source code for this program was revealed in 2001, however, when former World Bank chief economist Joseph Stiglitz went public about the scam. More detail was added in 2004 by the publication of John Perkin's Confessions of an Economic Hitman, which revealed the extent to which front companies and complicit corporations aided, abetted and facilitated the economic plundering and overthrow of foreign governments. Although still an effective technique for overthrowing foreign nations, the fact that this particular scam had been exposed meant that the architects of global geopolitics would have to find a new way to get rid of foreign, democratically elected governments.
Nu mai merg pe masuri de austeritate, doresc acum investitii si crestere economica. Intrebarea cine le face, ca statul nu are bani. O sa ne trimita ei acum investitorii si conditiile obligatorii ce trebuie sa le indeplinim. Este ca o executare silita la datorilee pe care le-am contractat, numai ca resursele vor fi ale noastre. Politica fmi de exploatare forta si dictat. Aici s-a ajuns datorita tradarii nationale.
Destabilization 1.2 involves seemingly disinterested, democracy promoting NGOs with feelgood names like the Open Society Institute, Freedom House and the National Endowment for Democracy. They fund, train, support and mobilize opposition movements in countries that have been targeted for destabilization, often during elections and usually organized around an identifiable color. These "color revolutions" sprang up in the past decade and have so far successfully destabilized the governments of the Ukraine, Lebanon, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan, among others. These revolutions bear the imprint of billionaire finance oligarch George Soros. The hidden hand of western powers behind these color revolutions has threatened their effectiveness in recent years, however, with an anti-Soros movement having arisen in Georgia and with the recent Moldovan "grape revolution" having come to naught (much to the chagrin of Soros-funded OSI's Evgeny Morozov).
Now we arrive at Destabilization 2.0, really not much more than a slight tweak of Destabilization 1.2. The only thing different is that now Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are being employed to amplify the effect of (and the impression of) internal protests. Once again, Soros henchman Evgeny Morozov is extolling the virtues of the new Tehran Twitter revolution and the New York Times is writing journalistic hymns to the power of internet new media...when it serves western imperial interests. We are being asked to believe that this latest version of the very (very) old program of U.S. corporate imperialism is the real deal. While there is no doubt that the regime of Ahmadenijad is reprehensible and the feelings of many of the young protestors in Iran are genuine, you will forgive me for quesyioning the motives behind the monolithic media support for the overthrow of Iran's government and the installation of Mir-Houssein "Butcher of Beirut" Mousavi
Marile trusturi de presa sunt finantate de mari corporatii imperialiste. Prin acestea se face propaganda si anti propaganda, in interesul imperialismului. De multe ori aceaste activitatii de manipulare a maselor, uzeaza de tehnici de calomniere, amenintare, a adversarilor politicii. Toate la un loc sunt instrumentate si controlate de serviciile secrete. Asta-i lumea libera de dupa 1989.